Enhancing Design Thinking through Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Augmented Curriculum to Support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Chinese Vocational Education: A Bibliometric and Mixed-Methods Study

Feng Yang(1), Jiraporn Chano(2), Bahtiar Mohamad(3),


(1) Mahasarakham University, Thailand; Guangzhou Polytechnic University
(2) Mahasarakham University
(3) Universiti Utara Malaysia
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Traditional vocational art and design education in China often emphasizes technical skills while providing limited support for creative problem-solving. This study developed and evaluated an artificial intelligence-augmented curriculum to enhance design thinking and support Sustainable Development Goals in Chinese vocational education. A bibliometric and mixed-methods design was applied through curriculum mapping, pre-test and post-test measurement, and semi-structured interviews. The findings showed improvement in overall design thinking, especially collaboration, problem orientation, and test iteration. However, empathy developed more slowly because generative AI produced standardized outputs with limited emotional depth. The study highlights the value of integrating AI with human guidance, reflective practice, and ethical creative judgment.

Keywords


Artificial intelligence; Bibliometric study; Curriculum development; Design thinking; Sustainable development goals; Vocational education

References


Abosede, P. J., Idris, I. A., Adeola, I. M., Glory, T., and Stephen, G. O. (2025). Community service assessment of demographic predictors of undergraduates’ readiness to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools for learning. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 4(2), 77-90.

Agboola, O. P. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing design innovation and sustainability. Smart Design Policies Journal, 1(1), 6-14.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.

Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

De Peuter, S., Oulasvirta, A., and Kaski, S. (2023). Toward AI assistants that let designers design. AI Magazine, 44(1), 85-96.

Di Dio, S., Russo, D., Monterosso, F., and Inzerillo, B. (2024). Designing the future: A manifesto for design education. Intelligent Human Systems Integration, 119, 725-735.

Fiandini, M., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., and Muktiarni, M. (2024a). Experimental demonstration for teaching the concept of steam engine power plant to vocational students to support the sustainability development goals (SDGS) and its comparison to Indonesian Merdeka curriculum. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 19(5), 1878-1905.

Fiandini, M., Hofifah, S. N., Ragadhita, R., and Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2024b). How to make a cognitive assessment instrument in the merdeka curriculum for vocational high school students: A case study of generating device materials about the stirling engine. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 3(1), 65-86.

Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., and Ketter, W. (2022). Cognitive challenges in human-artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Information Systems Research, 33(2), 678-696.

Glushchenko, V. V., Trubacheev, E. V., Feshchenko, V. V., and Khakimov, R. M. (2027). Teaching inclusive technology design through design thinking: An educational framework for community and special needs education in support of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 6(1), 1-10.

Graf, L. (2021). How country size matters for institutional change: Comparing skill formation policies in Germany and Switzerland. Comparative Education, 57(4), 474-495.

Haristiani, N., and Kusumawati, M. (2026). Integrating information and communication technology (ICT) and language in vocational education: A bibliometric and qualitative perspective toward workforce readiness and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 19, 55-63.

Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., and Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 27-37.

Katel, K. (2026). Artificial intelligence (AI) ChatGPT in academic and science writing education: Student dependency, creativity, and the mediating role of feedback in English as a second language and English as a foreign language contexts. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 5(2), 155-166.

Mulder, M., Weigel, T., and Collins, K. (2007). The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states: A critical analysis. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59(1), 67-88.

Nagaraju, K., and Ramakrishna, S. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and geospatial technologies for community-centered urban expansion forecasting in Hyderabad. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 3(2), 135-146.

Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2026). How to read and interpret FTIR spectra for materials: A master dataset with step-by-step guided peak-correlation analysis, representative examples, and a foundation for future artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis. ASEAN Journal for Science and Engineering in Materials, 5(2), 323-356.

Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Fiandini, M., Hofifah, S. N., Ragadhita, R., Al Husaeni, D. F., Al Husaeni, D. N., Al Husaeni, D. F., Maryanti, R., and Masek, A. (2022). Collaborative practicum with experimental demonstration for teaching the concept of production of bioplastic to vocational students to support the sustainability development goals. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(2), 1-13.

Nnanguma, K. A. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence for climate-smart agriculture and sustainable food systems. ASEAN Journal of Agriculture and Food Engineering, 4(2), 71-80.

Pelau, C., Dabija, D. C., and Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106855.

Ragadhita, R., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Maryanti, R., Al Husaeni, D. F., Al Husaeni, D. N., Fiandini, M., Mudzakir, A., Hufad, A., and Masek, A. (2023). Best practice in distance learning with experimental demonstration on the concept of the automotive brake pad fabrication from domestic waste to vocational students for supporting education for sustainable development. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(1), 40-54.

Razzouk, R., and Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.

Shneiderman, B. (2007). Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 50(12), 20-32.

Zhao, Y., Tan, W. H., Nian, Z., Li, Z., and Liu, K. (2023). Design thinking as a case-based learning for college general education courses. Migration Letters, 20(S1), 628-646.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 28 times
PDF Download : 8 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Bumi Publikasi Nusantara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.