Email this article 
Exploring Elementary Students’ Difficulties in Understanding the Concept of Density: A Comprehensive Review Analysis
),
(1) Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
References
Bar, V. (1987). Comparison of the development of ratio concepts in two domains. Science Education, 71(4), 599–613.
Borreguero, G., Naranjo Correa, F., Núñez, M., and Martín, J. (2018). Recreational experiences for teaching basic scientific concepts in primary education: The case of density and pressure. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), 1-16.
Dawkins, K., Dickerson, D., McKinney, S., and Butler, S. (2008). Teaching density to middle school students: Preservice science teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(1), 21–26.
Fassoulopoulos, G., Kariotoglou, P., and Koumaras, P. (2003). Consistent and inconsistent pupils' reasoning about intensive quantities: The case of density and pressure. Research in Science Education, 33, 71–87.
Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 548–554.
Gaitanidi, M. (2023). A comparative study of the learning outcomes of the didactic use of the "Density Column" experiment in 5th-grade students. Neos Paidagogos, 1(38), 115–121.
Gaitanidi, M., and Giannakoudakis, P. (2024). The learning effects of a teaching learning sequence (TLS) about building the concept of density of pure substances and solutions in primary school students. Journal of the Association of Greek Chemists, 1, 51–57.
Ginns, I., and Watters, J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understandings of preservice elementary teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 205-222.
Gray, M., DeWolf, M., Bassok, M., and Holyoak, K. (2018). Dissociation between magnitude comparison and relation identification across different formats for rational numbers. Thinking and Reasoning, 24(2), 179-197.
Hanuscin, D., Cisterna, D., and Lipsitz, K. (2018). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching structure and properties of matter. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(8), 665–692.
Harrell, P., and Subramaniam, K. (2014). Teachers need to be smarter than a 5th grader: What elementary pre-service teachers know about density. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 1–23.
Hashweh, M. (2015). The complexity of teaching density in middle school. Research in Science and Technological Education, 34(1), 1–24.
Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2005). Examining young children’s conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259-279.
Hewson, P., and Hewson Mariana. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13.
Heyworth, R. (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195–211.
Hitt, A. (2005). Attacking a dense problem: A learner-centered approach to teaching density. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 42(1), 25–29.
Johnson, P., and Papageorgiou, G. (2009). Rethinking the introduction of particle theory: A substance-based framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 130–150.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L., and Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34, 71–96.
Kariotoglou, P., and Psillos, D. (1993). Pupils' Pressure Models and their Implications for Instruction. Research in Science and Technological Education, 11(1), 95-108.
Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L., and Yeary, S. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: A case study of third and fourth grade students' developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1299-1324.
Kiray, S., and Simsek, S. (2021). Determination and evaluation of the science teacher candidates’ misconceptions about density by using four-tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 935–955.
Kloos, H. (2007). Interlinking physical beliefs: Children's bias towards logical congruence. Cognition, 103(2), 227–252.
Klopfer, L., Champagne, A., and Chaiklin, S. (1992). The ubiquitous quantities: Explorations that inform the design of instruction on the physical properties of matter. Science Education, 76, 597–614.
Kohn, A. (1993). Preschoolers' reasoning about density: Will it float? Child Development, 64(6), 1637–1650.
Lederman, N., and Lederman, J. (2015). The status of preservice science teacher education: A global perspective. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 1–6.
Lin, H.-S., Shiau, B.-R., and Lawrenz, F. (1996). The effectiveness of teaching science with pictorial analogies. Research in Science Education, 26, 495–511.
McMullen, J., and Van Hoof, J. (2020). The role of rational number density knowledge in mathematical development. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101228.
Ni, Y., and Zhou, Y. D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52.
Perkins, D., and Grotzer, T. (2005). Dimensions of causal understanding: The role of complex causal models in students' understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 41(1), 117–165.
Rice, D. (2005). I didn't know oxygen could boil! What preservice and inservice elementary teachers' answers to ‘simple’ science questions reveals about their subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1059-1082.
Seah, L., Clarke, D., and Hart, C. (2015). Understanding middle school students’ difficulties in explaining density differences from a language perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2386–2409.
Smith, C., Carey, S., and Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21(3), 177–237.
Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L., and Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for understanding: A study of students' preinstruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 317–393.
Smith, C., Snir, J., and Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instructio, 9(3), 221-283.
Streefland, L. (1985). Search for the roots of ratio: Some thoughts on the long term learning process (towards ... a theory). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 75-94.
Valanides, N. (2000). Primary student teachers' understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(2), 249–262.
Vamvakousi, X., and Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 181–209.
Xu, L., and Clarke, D. (2012). Student difficulties in learning density: A distributed cognition perspective. Research in Science Education, 42, 769–789.
Zenger, T., and Bitzenbauer, P. (2022). Exploring German secondary school students’ conceptual knowledge of density. Science Education International, 33(1), 66–73.
Zongo, I., Bougouma, M., and Moucheron, C. (2023). Proposal for a didactic tool on teaching practices related to the selective sorting of plastic waste according to relative density in high schools: Case study in Burkina Faso. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(3), 1118– 1127.
Zoupidis, A., Pnevmatikos, D., Spyrtou, A., and Kariotoglou, P. (2016). The impact of procedural and epistemological knowledge on conceptual understanding: The case of density and floating–sinking phenomena. Instructional Science, 44, 315–334.
Zoupidis, A., Spyrtou, A., Pnevmatikos, D., and Kariotoglou, P. (2021). Teaching and learning floating and sinking: Didactic transformation in a density-based approach. Fluids, 6(4), 1-158.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 104 times
Download : 18 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Bumi Publikasi Nusantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
