Math Readiness and its Effect on the Online Academic Performance of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Students

Yvrin Gabriel D. Lagcao(1), Jean Paul Andrei D. Dechavez(2), Daven John G. Goleng(3), Alyssa Khate E. Lamzon(4), Khalid Yasper M. Tangkli(5), Welard Jay C. Vicera(6),


(1) Sultan Kudarat State University
(2) Sultan Kudarat State University
(3) Sultan Kudarat State University
(4) Sultan Kudarat State University
(5) Sultan Kudarat State University
(6) Sultan Kudarat State University
Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study sought to determine if the Mathematics readiness of the Grade 12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) students of SKSU-LHS during the academic year 2020-2021 has directly affected their academic attainments within the STEM strand amid the online learning modality. In doing so, this study employed a descriptive-correlational quantitative research design because conclusions only drove the results without any inference to conform to the main intent of this research. The study revealed no significant association between one’s readiness in Mathematics and their academic performance as Grade 12 STEM students amid the online learning modality in online learning modality. With this in mind, in an online learning setup, although Mathematics has a huge part within the STEM strand, students who are not mathematically inclined can still establish a decent academic standing and, at most, even excel.

Keywords


Academic Performance; Engineering; Mathematics strand; Online learning modality; Readiness in mathematics; Science; STEM; Technology

References


Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., and Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.

Gamit, A. D., Antolin, J. A., and Gabriel, A. G. (2017). The effects of cooperative learning in enhancing the performance level of grade-10 mathematics students in Talavera national high school in the Philippines. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 5(12), 2386-2401.

Heller, R. F., Dobson, A. J., Attia, J., and Page, J. (2002). Impact numbers: measures of risk factor impact on the whole population from case-control and cohort studies. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(8), 606-610.

Lappe, J. M. (2000). Taking the mystery out of research: Descriptive correlational design. Orthopaedic Nursing, 19(2), 81.

Li, Y., and Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-13.

Owston, R., York, D. N., Malhotra, T., and Sitthiworachart, J. (2020). Blended learning in STEM and Non-STEM courses: How do student performance and perceptions compare? Online Learning, 24(3), 203-221.

Quigley, C. F., and Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410-426.

Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 1063 times
PDF Download : 897 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Yayasan Bumi Publikasi Nusantara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.