Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, and Collaboration (4C) Competencies on Student Achievement: Evidence from PISA 2018 Using Structural Equation Modeling

Buriyeva Kibrio Ergashevna(1),


(1) Chirchik State Pedagogical University
Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study investigates the relationships between four core 21st-century competencies (Critical Thinking (CT), Creativity (CR), Communication (CM), and Collaboration (CL)) and student achievement in Uzbekistan using nationally representative PISA 2018 data (N = 4,950). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to estimate latent associations between 4C competencies and performance in mathematics, reading, and science, while controlling for socio-economic status (SES), gender, school type, and location. Results indicate that Critical Thinking is the strongest predictor across all domains, whereas Creativity significantly predicts mathematics and science, Communication primarily predicts reading, and Collaboration contributes to science achievement. SES demonstrates both direct and indirect effects, influencing competency development and academic outcomes. Model fit indices confirm acceptable structural validity. The findings highlight the predictive value of 4C competencies for academic success and provide empirical support for integrating 21st-century skills into curriculum reform and assessment policies in emerging education systems.

Keywords


4C competencies; Critical Thinking; Large-scale assessment; PISA 2018; Socio-economic status; Structural Equation Modeling (SEM); Student achievement; Uzbekistan

References


Beghetto, R. A., and Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69.

Dumont, H., Klinge, M., and Maaz, K. (2020). The many faces of socioeconomic inequality in education. Educational Research Review, 30, 100328.

Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (2017a). Cooperative learning and teaching citizenship. Journal of Social Psychology, 157(3), 269–283.

Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (2017b). The use of cooperative procedures in teacher education and professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 284–295.

Ku, K. Y. L., and Ho, I. T. (2018). Dispositional factors predicting Chinese students’ critical thinking performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 112–117.

Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.

Stoet, G., and Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593.

Voogt, J., and Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st-century competencies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 26 times
PDF Download : 57 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Bumi Publikasi Nusantara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.