Designing an Inclusive Employer-Disability Interaction Mechanism in Post-Industrial Conditions

Valery Vladimirovich Glushchenko(1),


(1) Moscow Polytechnic University
Corresponding Author

Abstract


The integration of people with disabilities into the workforce remains a critical challenge because existing mechanisms for employer engagement are often ineffective. This study aims to enhance the interaction between employers and people with disabilities by developing a more efficient framework suited to the evolving technological landscape. To achieve this, the research analyzes scientific literature, refines conceptual foundations, and explores ways to improve employer-employee interaction mechanisms. The study employs various scientific methods, including management theory, hierarchical systems theory, technological structures, and systematic comparative analysis. The findings indicate that a refined methodology can significantly enhance employer engagement because it provides a structured, efficiency-driven approach. The proposed framework has the potential to reshape employment practices, ensuring greater inclusivity and productivity. This research contributes to the development of sustainable employment solutions for people with disabilities, making workplaces more adaptive and accessible in the modern technological era.

Keywords


Concept; Disabled person; Efficiency; Employer; Interaction; Management; Mechanism; Method; Work.

References


Alagaraja, M., and Shuck, B. (2015). Exploring organizational alignment-employee engagement linkages and impact on individual performance: A conceptual model. Human Resource Development Review, 14(1), 17-37.

Ashford, N. A., Hall, R. P., Arango-Quiroga, J., Metaxas, K. A., and Showalter, A. L. (2020). Addressing inequality: The first step beyond COVID-19 and towards sustainability. Sustainability, 12(13), 5404.

Chen, B., Liu, T., and Wang, Y. (2020). Volatile fragility: new employment forms and disrupted employment protection in the new economy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1531.

Fitz-Koch, S., Nordqvist, M., Carter, S., and Hunter, E. (2018). Entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector: A literature review and future research opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(1), 129-166.

Jagannathan, S., Ra, S., and Maclean, R. (2019). Dominant recent trends impacting on jobs and labor markets-An Overview. International Journal of Training Research, 17(sup1), 1-11.

Kirk, D., Roper, M., and Wood, M. (2007). Identifying and addressing problems in object-oriented framework reuse. Empirical Software Engineering, 12, 243-274.

Namoun, A., Abi Sen, A. A., Tufail, A., Alshanqiti, A., Nawaz, W., and BenRhouma, O. (2022). A two-phase machine learning framework for context-aware service selection to empower people with disabilities. Sensors, 22(14), 5142.

Oke, A., and Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 31.

Salt, A., and Sargent, J. (2014). Common visual problems in children with disability. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 99(12), 1163-1168.

Vornholt, K., Villotti, P., Muschalla, B., Bauer, J., Colella, A., Zijlstra, F., and Corbière, M. (2018). Disability and employment–overview and highlights. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 40-55.

Walsh, J. P., Lee, Y. N., and Tang, L. (2019). Pathogenic organization in science: Division of labor and retractions. Research Policy, 48(2), 444-461.


Full Text: PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 95 times
PDF Download : 34 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Bumi Publikasi Nusantara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.